By Charlie Savage, New York Times “Election law specialists expressed caution. Richard H. Pildes, a New York University law professor, said the Justice Department faced a complex legal challenge, ‘particularly when some of these changes, such as reducing early voting, involve measures that make voting more convenient but don’t restrict direct…
Read More
Wedding Bells Jeffrey Toobin, The New Yorker “A decade later, it’s clear that Scalia was right. Once a society decides that the law must treat a group of people equally in one area of life, it becomes harder—and, eventually, impossible—to justify discriminating against them in others. If gay people can’t…
Read More
By Nikole Hannah-Jones, ProPublica “‘There were people in my class with lower grades who weren’t in all the activities I was in, who were being accepted into UT, and the only other difference between us was the color of our skin,’ she says. ‘I was taught from the time I…
Read More
Affirmative Action: What If the Supreme Court Ends It? Corporations struggling to develop a qualified pipeline of Black and Latino talent soon may face additional challenges in reaching their diversity and recruitment goals. It all depends on how the Supreme Court rules in the Fisher v. University of Texas case….
Read More
© Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland 410-516-8000
All rights reserved